The documents govern the method
Matthew Castle designated these ten distinct documents as the foundational information structure for both sites on November 4, 2026. Eleven files were supplied; the two copies of the matrix workbook were identical. The source documents identify themselves as September 2, 2026 working editions.
The AI retrieves relevant definitions, relationships, claim classifications, and theological boundaries from these records. It keeps each record’s document version, source location, and status. The separately identified published model collection provides later exposition and practical connections.
| Document | Purpose | Version |
|---|---|---|
| Canonization Charter | Governance | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Corpus Registry | Source inventory | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Concept Evolution Ledger | Development history | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Claims and Epistemology Ledger | Claims and evidence | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Canonical Definitions and First Principles | Definitions and first principles | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Canonical Glossary | Terminology | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Resonance Matrix and Website IA | Relationships and website structure | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Website Information Architecture | Website architecture | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Scripture and Theology Map | Scripture and theology | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
| Research Backlog and External Review | Research and external review | v0.1 2026-09-02 |
How to read an AI answer
Begin with the cited Isaiah verses. Then open the model sources to see which foundational definitions and published passages support the reasoning. New outputs distinguish consequential claims as scripture, model interpretation, modern application, analogy, hypothesis, official teaching where supported, or an open question.
Foundational status does not make every draft statement final. Working, pending, provisional, restricted, legacy, and retired labels remain visible in the source context. A research assignment is not a completed external review; a model interpretation is not Church doctrine.
When source versions differ
The September working documents and the later published edition differ on some terms. The AI must identify a material difference instead of silently combining versions or inventing a decision. These are the differences currently recorded:
Offer and Acceptance
The September 2 review definitions require an intentionally presented Offer and sufficiently understood voluntary Acceptance. The later published study edition broadens Offer and distinguishes agentic Acceptance from informed consent. Identify which version is being used; do not merge them or claim the pending review decisions have been ratified.
Perfect Truth
The September definition treats Perfect Truth as undistorted reality with Christ as its theological axis and marks ontology/theology wording pending. The published study edition identifies the Father as Perfect Truth and Christ as Perfect Expression. This is a source-version distinction, not a new official Church teaching.
Lesser and Elemental Truth
The foundation drafts restrict higher/lower language and distinguish Truth from understanding; the published edition retains later LT-01 lesser-Truth formulations. Preserve the later formulation as a documented published position while identifying its difference from the supplied review draft. Do not invent missing ratification records.
Spiritual field and Snap
The September drafts contain metaphor, Lab-only, legacy, and retired restrictions; later published passages retain some realist spiritual-imprint and threshold hypotheses. Name both source status and evidence status. Neither a retained hypothesis nor a founder decision establishes a measurable mechanism or scientific proof.
Resonance and Dissonance
The foundation definitions describe coherent correspondence and diagnostic mismatch with pending wording. Later published definitions add real transpersonal or spiritual scope. Preserve that version difference; disagreement or discomfort never establishes another person's spiritual failure.
What the connection includes
This edition indexes 5,676 records across 10 distinct documents. It uses the same snapshot as ResonanceModel.com. It does not automatically read private ChatGPT history or retrieve every source named in a registry. Private correspondence and internal notes are not published wholesale.
Knowledge edition: foundation-2026-11-04-6a27478b0bac. A reviewed import and deployment are required to incorporate revisions. Previously saved outputs retain the source edition used when generated.